Bottom-up Accountability for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Are subnational indicator systems aligned?
This briefing note evaluates, as a test case, alignment between subnational sustainable development indicators and the new Sustainable Development Goal indicators.
In this briefing note, we use provincial indicator sets as a test case for evaluating alignment with the new Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) indicators.
Based on a series of governmental, expert and stakeholder discussions, 231 SDG indicators have been identified—151 of which are considered well-established indicators already reported on by many statistical agencies. Though many of the indicators will only be reported at a national level, many will be based on data collected at the subnational level, and it is intended that, where relevant, all indicators be disaggregated by geographic location. Ultimately, there remain many questions about how monitoring will be done at the subnational level, how data will be aggregated, and how to manage the collection and reporting of such a large number of indicators.
To see if subnational indicator sets are reporting on similar types of indicators and themes, and to examine the extent to which subnational indicators may align with the SDG indicators, we use provincial indicator sets as a test case for evaluating alignment with the new SDG indicators.
Participating experts
You might also be interested in
What Will Happen at COP 29?
Talks at the 2024 UN Climate Change Conference (COP 29) will range from defining a way forward on finance through a new collective quantified goal (NCQG) to mitigation, and loss and damage. Ahead of negotiations in Baku, IISD’s Earth Negotiations Bulletin Team Lead Jennifer Bansard examines the agenda and breaks down what to watch as eyes turn to Azerbaijan.
Why We Shouldn’t Give Up on the SDGs
The SDG framework may seem out of reach, but it’s the backbone of global cooperation.
Border Carbon Adjustment Mechanisms and Impacts on Vietnam
This report consolidates, analyzes, and presents views and perspectives of stakeholders from Vietnam on border carbon adjustment (BCA) schemes to contribute to the global debate on BCA good practices.
The United Kingdom's Strategy for Carbon Border Adjustment in a Changing Global Landscape
This report consolidates, analyzes, and presents views and perspectives of United Kingdom stakeholders on its proposed Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to contribute to the global debate on international principles and best practices for national border carbon adjustment schemes.