Indicator Preferences in National Reporting of Progress Toward the Sustainable Development Goals
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are intended to offer an ambitious and transformational agenda for our common future through 2030. In this brief, we review countries’ voluntary reviews to the HLPF to identify the indicators that countries have actually been using in their reports to date, and data attached to those indicators.
The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) are intended to offer an ambitious and transformational agenda for our common future through 2030.
In this brief, we review countries’ voluntary reviews to the High-Level Political Forum (HLPF) to identify the indicators that countries have actually been using in their reports to date, and data attached to those indicators. We are starting with nine countries (Finland, Germany, Georgia, Mexico, Sierra Leone, South Korea, Switzerland, Venezuela, Uganda) using their official reports submitted to the HLPF. The basic framework is:
- Countries that are producing reviews.
- Indicators included in each country’s review.
- Alignment of the included indicators in the country’s report with indicators suggested by the UN Statistical Commission to track progress with SDGs.
The SDG indicator set has been developed by national statistical agencies with the coordination of the United Nations Statistical Division (UNSD).
Based on this study, the following three preliminary recommendations can be made. First, countries should build up their SDG reporting capacities and practice based on their existing systems of measurement, while taking into account the global guidance developed by UNSD. Second, while keeping as close as possible to the global SDG indicator system, they could also complement global metrics with national ones related to key national issues if no global metrics are available for them. And third, tracking progress should not leave blank spots—indicators should cover not only what is easy and convenient for policy, but also—and perhaps particularly—those issues such as sustainable consumption and production, which are conflicted, where entrenched interests may work against transparency or change, but that may lie at the heart of the SDG challenge.
You might also be interested in
What Will Happen at COP 29?
Talks at the 2024 UN Climate Change Conference (COP 29) will range from defining a way forward on finance through a new collective quantified goal (NCQG) to mitigation, and loss and damage. Ahead of negotiations in Baku, IISD’s Earth Negotiations Bulletin Team Lead Jennifer Bansard examines the agenda and breaks down what to watch as eyes turn to Azerbaijan.
Why We Shouldn’t Give Up on the SDGs
The SDG framework may seem out of reach, but it’s the backbone of global cooperation.
Border Carbon Adjustment Mechanisms and Impacts on Vietnam
This report consolidates, analyzes, and presents views and perspectives of stakeholders from Vietnam on border carbon adjustment (BCA) schemes to contribute to the global debate on BCA good practices.
The United Kingdom's Strategy for Carbon Border Adjustment in a Changing Global Landscape
This report consolidates, analyzes, and presents views and perspectives of United Kingdom stakeholders on its proposed Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) to contribute to the global debate on international principles and best practices for national border carbon adjustment schemes.