The Australian Government's Illegal Logging Prohibition Bill: WTO implications
The Australian government is currently legislating to exclude illegally logged timber from imports and from domestic processing.
The proposals in the draft bill include: a prohibition on the import of all timber products containing illegally logged timber, and on the processing of domestically grown raw logs that have been illegally harvested; a requirement on importers and processors to undertake due diligence to mitigate the risk of products containing illegally logged timber; and a comprehensive monitoring, investigation and enforcement regime to ensure compliance.The proposed legislation has been criticized on the basis, among other things, that it conflicts with the disciplines of the World Trade Organization. Similar criticisms have, on occasion, been levelled at other consumer-country measures to exclude illegal timber from their markets, such as the European Union's Forest Law Enforcement, Governance and Trade licensing scheme and Timber Regulation, or the United States' Lacey Act.This paper explores whether the measures proposed in the Australian legislation are likely to be WTO-compatible, and concludes that they should be. The Australian government will need to be careful to ensure the legislation is designed and implemented in ways that do not afford protection to Australian products, and is as non-trade-restrictive as possible. Within those constraints, however, they should not be inhibited from pressing ahead and introducing measures, similar to those being implemented in other consumer countries, to exclude illegal products from the market-and by so doing, improve sustainable development, protect the interests of companies playing by the rules and uphold the rule of law.
You might also be interested in
The WTO and Fisheries Subsidies: Where are we, exactly?
What are the latest developments in WTO fisheries subsidies negotiations, focusing on marine conservation, community impact, and sustainable fishing practices? Tristan Irschlinger offers a comprehensive overview explaining key aspects of the agreement, ongoing discussions, and what’s at stake for global fishery sustainability.
IISD Trade and Sustainability Review, October 2024
This edition of the IISD Trade and Sustainability Review presents five unique perspectives on the global governance landscape of digital trade.
Adding Fuel to the Fire: How export restrictions can exacerbate climate change’s impacts on global food security
Higher temperatures will likely reduce agricultural yields and production in most countries, raising global food prices and worsening food security. Avoiding export restrictions is crucial.
Global Cooperation on Border Carbon Measures: Broaching the tough issues
The need for international cooperation on border carbon adjustment (BCA) is becoming increasingly urgent. What are the most difficult issues to overcome and what steps can we take toward resolving them?