Report

Indonesia’s Next Cooking Transition

Shifting to non-fossil cooking

This report transition compares three alternatives—induction stoves, dimethyl ether (DME), and city gas—and finds that induction stoves are the most practical and viable option to support Indonesia’s shift to cleaner, non-fossil cooking. The report details a roadmap for scaling induction cookstoves adoption in an inclusive 

By Anissa Suharsono, Maxensius Tri Sambodo, Felix W. Handoyo, Alan R. Farandy, Mesnan Silalahi, Ikval Suardi, Ika Inayah, AadyaEka Nurjati, Shruti Sharma, Tara Laan, Neil McCulloch on December 17, 2025

Key Messages

  • Cooking on induction is cheaper compared to unsubsidised LPG. Targeting LPG subsidies to low-income households and encouraging well off households to switch to induction can generate annual savings for the government ranging from IDR 7-12 trillion.

  • Compared to dimethyl ether (DME), and city gas, induction stoves are the most practical and viable option to support Indonesia’s shift to cleaner, non-fossil cooking.

  • The single largest barrier to induction adoption is the current approach to LPG subsidies. Reforming LPG subsidies is critical to encouraging households to switch to induction that is cheaper to cook on compared to unsubsidized LPG.

Indonesia currently spends trillions subsidizing the 3-kg LPG cylinder each year for households—much of it flowing to households that do not need financial support. LPG subsidy stood at IDR 80.2 trillion/USD 5.14 billion in 2024, resulting in substantial financial strains on the government’s budget along with energy security concerns, as most of the domestically consumed LPG was imported. 

This report compares three alternatives to LPG for cooking—induction stoves, dimethyl ether (DME), and city gas—and finds that induction stoves are the most practical and viable option to support Indonesia’s shift to cleaner, non-fossil cooking. The report's findings are based on focus group discussions, in-depth interviews, and a survey of 100 households that had previously received an induction stove as part of a government pilot. 

This report finds that induction is cheaper for both households and the government when LPG is not subsidized. Encouraging households to switch from LPG to induction can result in household savings. Induction cookstoves also encourage public spending on upgrading the electricity supply, which can support broader electrification goals, such as those for cooling, electric vehicles, rooftop solar, and home batteries. 

LPG subsidies remain the single largest barrier to induction adoption. As LPG subsidies are universally available, households have limited incentive to shift to alternatives. The need to protect people on low income from higher energy prices necessitates a scenario where LPG subsidies are maintained for low-income households, but for well-off households, LPG subsidies can be swapped for induction subsidies. This report finds that this scenario can generate annual savings for the government ranging from IDR 7.61 trillion (approximately USD 459 million) to IDR 11.87 trillion (approximately USD 717 million). These savings can be used for the capital investment required for the adoption of induction cookstoves among households. 

This report recommends: 

  1. Make electricity consumption and upgrades more affordable for scaling up adoption of induction cookstoves: Reform regulations to lower voltage upgrade costs, establish block tariffs for low-income households while ensuring cost recovery, and prioritize grid modernization.
  2. Implement subsidies for induction stoves: To reduce LPG dependence, implement one-off connection subsidies for induction stoves and induction compliant cookware.
  3. Reform LPG subsidies: The single largest barrier to induction adoption is the current approach to LPG subsidies. Reforming LPG subsidies with clear milestones and public awareness, while testing approaches like cash transfers to better target women from low-income households could save IDR 7–12 trillion per year in public spending.

 

Project partner:

BRIN logo

Report details

Topic
Climate Change Mitigation
Energy
Gender Equality
Subsidies
Region
Indonesia
Impact area
Climate
Publisher
IISD
Copyright
IISD, 2025